Evidence Hub

Utilization of cellulose nanofiber in dental applications: A systematic review of in vitro evidence

Kunhua Yang, Alexander Patera Nugraha, Junduo Chen, Hui Yang, Jingyu Wang, Juan Ramón Vanegas Sáenz, Guang Hong

Japanese Dental Science Review, 2025

8 citations

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to determine how cellulose nanofiber (CNF) enhance the mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and functional versatility of dental materials, based on in vitro evidence. A systematic review protocol was developed according to PRISMA 2020. The literature search was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase for English-language publications with no date restrictions, yielding 180 publications. After removing duplicates, 150 remained, from which 23 were evaluated in full. 17 in vitro studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 13 had a low risk of bias, 4 had a moderate risk, and none had a high risk. Across all included investigations, CNF consistently improved mechanical performance, particularly flexural and compressive strength, while maintaining or enhancing biocompatibility in various cell culture models. CNF’s nanofibrillar structure and modifiable surface chemistry also expanded its functional versatility, enabling applications such as drug encapsulation and targeted antimicrobial delivery. Overall, CNF emerges as a promising biomaterial for modern dentistry, offering superior mechanical reinforcement, favorable cell responses, and wide-ranging functional modifications. Further in vivo research and clinical trials are necessary to confirm its long-term safety and efficacy, thereby facilitating the translation of these in vitro findings into standard dental practice.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free