Evidence Hub

Technological Innovations and Pedagogical Advancements in Basketball Skill Learning: A Systematic Review of High School Physical Education

A. N. Abady, Patrick Willyam M. Butar Butar Patrick Willyam M. Butar Butar, J. Longakit, Velorine Gordichev Velorine Gordichev

INSPIREE: Indonesian Sport Innovation Review, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Purpose of The Study. This systematic review investigates technological and pedagogical innovations in high school basketball skill education. The study evaluates theoretical frameworks, identifies effective strategies for varied learners, establishes a skill acquisition framework, and offers practical insights for educators and curriculum designers.

Material and methods. The research employed a systematic review methodology adhering to the PRISMA framework. The study searched multiple academic databases, primarily SCOPUS, targeting English publications from 2015-2024. The search applied Boolean logic and controlled vocabulary to examine basketball skill learning, technological interventions, and educational methodologies. Inclusion criteria included peer-reviewed articles relevant to high school basketball skill development with technological or pedagogical innovations. The analysis concentrated on three analytical dimensions: technological interventions, pedagogical approaches, and performance metrics.

Results. The systematic review indicated notable advancements in basketball skill acquisition influenced by technological and pedagogical innovations. Intelligent sensor technologies offer high precision in movement evaluation, while cognitive science integration fosters novel skill development avenues. Artificial intelligence and machine learning demonstrate significant improvements in tactical skills, with enhancements ranging from 9.655 to 13.989 through generative AI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free