Evidence Hub

Robot-assisted medication management in home care and long-term care settings: a mixed-method systematic review

Maryam Maleki, A. Mardani, Edris Kakemam, A. Huertas-Zurriaga, M. Vaismoradi

Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Medication errors and non-adherence in older adults are major issues linked to polypharmacy, cognitive decline, and caregiver burden. Medication management robots offer promise in improving patient care but require thorough evaluation . This review synthesizes the experiences of patients and caregivers, assesses the effectiveness of MMR in enhancing medication safety and minimizing errors, and offers insights into its broader implications for elderly home care. Methods A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed across six databases – PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, and ProQuest – without publication date limits. Studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), and findings were synthesized through a convergent approach. Results Six studies (3 qualitative, 2 quantitative, 1 mixed-methods) from Sweden, Finland, and the U.S.A. were included. MMRs improved adherence, reduced medication errors, enhanced coordination among healthcare providers, and supported patient autonomy. Key challenges involved technical issues, such as incompatibility with liquid medications, concerns about privacy, and reluctance from users due to diminished human contact. Conclusion MMRs show promise in elderly care, but successful adoption depends on structured training, ethical safeguards, and user-centered design. Further research is required to validate their long-term impact and optimize…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free