Evidence Hub

Volatile diagnostic techniques for ventilator associated pneumonia

Martyn Lee Humphreys

CERES (Cranfield University), 2010

1 citation

Abstract

Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) is a significant challenge for the Intensive Care doctors worldwide. It is both difficult to diagnose accurately and quickly and to treat effectively once the diagnosis has been established. Current diagnostic microbiological methods of diagnosis can take up to 48 hours to yield results. Early diagnosis and treatment remain the best way of improving outcome for patients with VAP. In this study we look at novel diagnostic techniques for VAP. Electronic nose (Enose) technology was used to identify to identify the presence of microorganisms in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid samples taken from the respiratory tracts of ventilated patients. The results were compared with standard microbiological culture and sensitivities. The Enose was able to discriminate 83% of samples into growth or no growth groups on samples grown in the lab. When the technique was employed to samples taken directly from patients the accuracy fell to 68.2%. This suggests that patient related factors may be reducing the accuracy of the Enose classification. The use of antimicrobial drugs prior to patient sampling is likely to have played a major role. The second part of this study used Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of patient’s breath in an attempt to identify patients with VAP. Breath samples were taken at the same time as the bronchoalveolar lavage samples described above. The use of this technique did show differences between the breath…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free