Evidence Hub

Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced dual-energy computed tomography for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in patients with malignant tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Derui Kong, Xinyu Chen, Peihong Gao, Kexin Zhao, Chong Zheng, Hongwei Zhou

Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 2023

984 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Background This meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cancer. Methods PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for literature published from database inception until September 2022. Only studies that investigated the diagnostic accuracy of DECT for metastatic lymph nodes in patients with malignant tumors and surgically removed metastatic lymph nodes for pathological confirmation were included. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. The threshold effect was determined by calculating Spearman correlation coefficients and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve patterns. Deeks test was used to assess publication bias. Results All of the included studies were observational studies. A total of 16 articles involving 984 patients were included (2,577 lymph nodes) in this review. A total of 15 variables were included in the meta-analysis, including 6 individual parameters and 9 combined parameters. Normalized iodine concentration (NIC) in the arterial phase combined with the slope in the arterial phase showed better identification of metastatic lymph nodes. The spearman correlation coefficient was −0.371 (P=0.468), and the SROC curve did not show a “shoulder-arm” shape, suggesting that there was no threshold effect and that heterogeneity was present.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 984 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free