Evidence Hub

Preoperative low-energy diets for patients with a body mass index >30 kg/m2 undergoing non-bariatric surgery: pilot feasibility randomized clinical trial and a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy data

T. McKechnie, O. Kuszaj, H. Perks, S. Rattansi, Carolina Meyhofer Pedroso, P. Staibano, A. Thabane, Jordan Leitch et al.

British Journal of Surgery, 2026

373 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Background The current evidence for preoperative low-energy diets (LEDs) for patients with a BMI >30 kg/m2 before non-bariatric surgery rests on studies with a high risk of bias. An RCT is warranted to bridge this knowledge gap. Before a larger RCT, a pilot feasibility RCT was conducted to address potential hurdles for the larger trial. Methods The pilot feasibility multicentre trial was conducted in Canada at four centres between 3 January 2024 and 23 October 2024. Patients were randomized (1 : 1 randomly permuted online blocked allocation) to receive a 3-week LED protocol or standard care. All patients aged >18 years with a BMI >30 kg/m2 undergoing elective non-bariatric intra-abdominal or orthopaedic surgery were evaluated for enrolment. Main exclusion criteria were LED contraindications and surgery scheduled without at least 3 weeks notice. The primary outcome was descriptive including the following feasibility outcomes: recruitment rate, randomization percentage, intervention adherence, and follow-up completion. Clinical outcomes included anthropometric data. The primary outcome analysis was descriptive. Additionally, a random-effects meta-analysis was performed using data from the present study and data from previously published RCTs to evaluate 30-day postoperative morbidity. The last follow-up date was 14 January 2025. Results Out of 373 patients approached, 288 were eligible. Of these, 175 consented to be randomized (60.8% (95% c.i. 54.9–66.4%)). Seventy…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 373 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free