Evidence Hub

Low-carbohydrate diets reduce cardiovascular risk factor levels in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Shanshan Pi, Shu-Wen Zhang, Junjie Zhang, Yi Guo, Yue Li, Jinyan Deng, Hongbo Du

Frontiers in Nutrition, 2025

1,056 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

Background Low-carbohydrate diets (LCDs) are increasingly advocated for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD); however, their cardiovascular safety profile remains controversial. This analysis aims to evaluate the effects of LCDs on cardiovascular risk factors in MASLD patients. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from inception to March 19, 2025. Two reviewers independently conducted data extraction. Meta-analyses were performed using fixed-effects or random-effects models, as determined by the heterogeneity of the included studies. Outcomes included blood pressure, glycemic markers, lipid profiles, and anthropometric indicators. Subgroup analyses explored carbohydrate thresholds (<26% vs. ≥26%) and intervention durations (<24 weeks vs. ≥24 weeks). Results Sixteen RCTs comprising 1,056 participants were included. LCDs significantly reduced glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c: SMD, −0.27; 95% CI, −0.47 to −0.07), triglyceride (TG: SMD, −0.20; 95% CI, −0.34 to −0.06), body weight (SMD, −0.19; 95% CI, −0.36 to −0.03), and body mass index (BMI: SMD, −0.28; 95% CI, −0.42 to −0.14). Stricter carbohydrate restriction (<26% energy) further improved systolic/diastolic blood pressure, homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), HbA1c, TG, body weight, BMI, and waist circumference. Short-term interventions (<24 weeks) lowered HbA1c, TG, and BMI. Conclusion This systematic review and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,056 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free