Evidence Hub

Ultrasound assessment of muscle atrophy and its association with functional outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chen-Chun Lin, Yi-Jia Lin, Chi-Tsung Chen, Hsiao-Min Chou, Wei-Chun Hsu

Critical Care, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

Critically ill patients experience rapid skeletal muscle wasting due to immobility and systemic inflammation. Traditional imaging modalities—including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry—can accurately quantify muscle mass but are impractical for monitoring critically ill patients because of cost, radiation, and logistical constraints. Ultrasound offers a bedside, radiation-free, and repeatable alternative capable of assessing both quantitative (cross-sectional area, muscle thickness) and qualitative (echointensity, pennation angle) muscle changes. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes existing evidence regarding ultrasound-derived measures of muscle atrophy monitoring in critically ill adults. A systematic search identified 69 eligible studies evaluating lower-limb muscle ultrasound in the ICU. Meta-analysis demonstrated substantial, progressive atrophy. By Day 7 of ICU admission, the rectus femoris cross-sectional area showed a decline of 15.76% (95% CI − 18.06 to − 13.47, I2 = 88.72%), while quadriceps muscle thickness exhibited a parallel, yet smaller, reduction of 11.00% (95%CI − 14.38 to − 7.62, I2 = 90.63%). Echointensity tended to increase, while pennation angle decreased, reflecting compositional and architectural deterioration. Considerable heterogeneity may reflect differences in patient characteristics, anatomical landmarks, and ultrasound technical factors. Limited data linked early ultrasound…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free