Evidence Hub

Artificial sweeteners and their implications for patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Adrian Lück, Fabian Standl, H. Stich

Journal of Medicine and Life, 2026

529 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Since their discovery in the 18th century, artificial sweeteners have been an important part of modern-day nutrition. The same applies to sugar consumption, which has increased massively in the last few decades. That is why the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends limiting free sugar intake to less than 10% of total daily energy intake, with additional benefits likely at levels below 5% per day. This high consumption led to the fact that diabetes is now one of the most frequent comorbidities in the world, with around 529 million people suffering from this disease. Patients need to be careful with their diet, which raises the question of whether artificial sweeteners should be mandatory in a diabetic nutrition plan. To answer this question, a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and a meta-analysis were conducted. Overall, 22 studies were included in this review. The results of the studies were ambivalent, and no general statement could thus be made. We found the same results in the meta-analysis, where Hedges' g was used as an effect size. Artificial sweeteners were associated with higher insulin (g = 0.50, 95% CI, 0.19-0.82) and higher HbA1c (g = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.06-0.54) in common-effects models; however, these associations were not relevant in random-effects models, and heterogeneity was substantial. No consistent effects were observed for other outcomes. Based on current evidence, the routine use of artificial sweeteners in diabetic diets cannot be…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 529 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free