Evidence Hub

EP09.01 intraoperative radiotherapy for resectable brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

C. Dejonckheere, M. Schneider, A. Potthoff, M. Hamed, D. Scafa, T. Zeyen, L. Friker, F. Kugel et al.

Neuro-Oncology, 2025

261 participants

Abstract

In recent years, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with low-energy X-rays is emerging as an alternative to postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) of the resection cavity in patients with resectable brain metastases (BMs).

We performed a systematic review of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases, including all original articles on IORT for resectable BMs from 2015−2025. Data on safety, local control, and survival outcomes were collected.

Ten records (5 prospective single-arm trials) were included, representing 261 patients (49% lung primary) with a median follow-up (range) of 14 (0−79) months. 77% of patients had a solitary BM at the time of surgery and IORT. The median applicator size was 2.0 cm and the median prescribed dose (range) 22.3 (20−30) Gy. The 1-year local control rate was 93% and the 1-year distant brain control rate 48%. Median overall survival was 19 months. Only 6% of patients developed leptomeningeal disease and the cumulative rate of radiation necrosis was 2.6% (grade 1 in 56% of cases). The median time to next treatment (range) was 31 (1−136) days. This was significantly shorter compared to SRT control collectives.

IORT for patients with BMs has a favorable toxicity profile and yields excellent local control. A potential advantage is the rapid completion of interdisciplinary BM treatment, allowing a swift transition to subsequent cancer treatments. A planned registry and a prospective randomized phase 3 trial will establish the preferred…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 261 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free