Evidence Hub

Accuracy of predictive equations versus indirect calorimetry for the evaluation of energy expenditure in cancer patients with solid tumors - An integrative systematic review study

Rafaela Mazzo, F. Ribeiro, A. Vasques

Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 2020

16 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Cancer is one the principal causes of death, and is considered a health issue worldwide. Cancer patients are at high risk of malnutrition due to the disease and the treatment itself. Nutritional therapy is part of a multi-modal treatment and it is important to be aware of the patient's energy expenditure to aid in decision-making for dietotherapeutic prescription. Indirect Calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard method for measuring energy expenditure (EE); but due to its often high cost in clinical practise, equations that measure energy expenditure are usually used.

OBJECTIVES

To perform an integrative systematic review, searching in the literature for how predictive equations of EE behave in relation to IC in cancer patients with solid tumors, considering the overall accuracy for cancer patients, the different tumor types, and the type of anti-cancer therapy applied.

METHODS

A review was carried out of systematic integrative type literature. The articles were searched for in three databases (Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science) using descriptors accompanied by Boolean operators. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were determined, and the articles found went through selection, analysis and extraction of their results.

RESULTS

A total of 688 articles were identified that underwent a thorough selection, resulting in 15 studies that included in this review. In five studies, the results showed that predictive equations underestimated the EE of cancer patients; in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free