Evidence Hub

Mechanical Power in Mechanical Ventilation and Its Association with Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury: A Systematic Review

Tomasz Urbankowski, Raman Pasledni, Marek Darowski

Respiratory Medicine, 2025

314,823 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mechanical power (MP) quantifies the total energy delivered from the ventilator to the respiratory system per unit time, integrating tidal volume, airway pressures, respiratory rate, and flow. MP has been proposed as a surrogate marker of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), but the consistency and generalizability of this association across patient populations remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To provide the most comprehensive systematic evaluation to date of the relationship between MP and VILI-related outcomes in adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for original studies reporting MP and clinical outcomes related to VILI. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. Certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies including 314,823 patients were analyzed. Forty (87%) demonstrated a statistically significant association between higher MP and adverse outcomes (mortality, prolonged ventilation, or ICU stay). Threshold effects were identified in 23 studies, most consistently between 14-18 J/min. Normalized MP (e.g., per predicted body weight or well-aerated lung volume) improved prognostic performance in selected cohorts. Despite heterogeneity and mostly observational designs, the overall signal was robust across diverse populations and clinical contexts.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 314,823 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free