Evidence Hub

A systematic review of ECG arrhythmia classification: embedded feasibility, adherence to standards, and fair evaluation

Guilherme A. L. Silva, Pedro Silva, G. Moreira, Vander L. de S. Freitas, J. Gertrudes, Eduardo José da S. Luz

Research on Biomedical Engineering, 2025

22 citations

Abstract

The classification of electrocardiogram (ECG) signals is essential for early arrhythmia detection. However, many studies fail to follow standardization protocols, leading to inconsistencies in performance evaluation and real-world applicability. Additionally, hardware constraints crucial for deployment in pacemakers, Holter monitors, and wearable ECG patches are often overlooked, limiting practical use in resource-constrained environments. This review systematically analyzes ECG classification research published between 2017 and 2024, focusing on studies that meet the E3C (Embedded, Clinical, and Comparative Criteria). These criteria include adherence to the inter-patient paradigm, compliance with AAMI recommendations, and evaluation of model feasibility for embedded deployment. We conduct a comparative analysis of accuracy, inference time, energy consumption, and memory usage, identifying state-of-the-art methods that align with the E3C. Our findings show that while many models achieve high accuracy, few address key constraints like patient-independent data partitioning and hardware limitations. Finally, we propose standardized performance reporting to enable fair comparisons and enhance real-world applicability. By addressing these gaps, this study aims to guide research toward more robust and clinically viable ECG classification models.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free