Evidence Hub

Endoscopic tissue shielding to prevent bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial

Yosuke Kataoka, Y. Tsuji, K. Hirasawa, K. Takimoto, T. Wada, S. Mochizuki, K. Ohata, Yoshiki Sakaguchi et al.

Endoscopy, 2019

140 participants · 61 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a severe adverse event. Recent reports have described the efficacy of the endoscopic shielding method with polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets and fibrin glue for the prevention of adverse events after ESD. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the PGA shielding method provides additional benefit in preventing post-ESD bleeding compared with standard care. Methods This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Patients at high risk of post-ESD bleeding were enrolled in the study. Before ESD, patients were randomized to either the PGA group or the control group. After completing ESD in the PGA group, PGA sheets were placed onto the ulcer floor and adhered with fibrin glue. The primary end point was the post-ESD bleeding rate. Results 140 eligible patients were enrolled from September 2014 to September 2016, and 137 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (67 in the PGA group and 70 in the control group). Post-ESD bleeding occurred in three patients (4.5 %) in the PGA group and in four patients (5.7 %) in the control group; there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.99). Post-ESD bleeding tended to occur later in the control group than in the PGA group (median 12.5 days [range 8 – 14] vs. 2 days [range 0 – 7], respectively). Conclusion The PGA shielding method did not demonstrate a significant effect on the prevention of post-ESD bleeding.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 140 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free