Evidence Hub

Early Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition Shortens Ventilation and Intensive Care Unit Stay in ICU Patients Aged ≥60 Years Requiring Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Feng Tang, Peng Guo, Wei Zhang, H. Qin, Huan Xu

Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS

This study aimed to assess the effects of early supplemental parenteral nutrition (E-SPN) on clinical outcomes in older adults Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients receiving mechanical ventilation who failed to meet their nutritional requirements through enteral feeding alone.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT), ICU patients aged ≥60 years who achieved <50% of prescribed energy or protein targets from enteral nutrition (EN) by ICU day 3 were enrolled. EN was initiated within 24 hours of ICU admission (prescribed energy target: up to 25 kcal/kg/day based on actual body weight (ABW); protein: 1.2-1.5 g/kg/day) and advanced progressively according to tolerance and metabolic monitoring. Eligible patients were randomized to either the E-SPN group (early supplemental parenteral nutrition, initiated on ICU day 3) or the L-SPN group (late supplemental parenteral nutrition, initiated on ICU day 7).

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients completed the study (E-SPN: 45; L-SPN: 47). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The E-SPN group achieved significantly higher energy and protein intake than the L-SPN group until day 7 (P<0.05). By day 10, serum albumin and prealbumin levels and diaphragm thickness and phosphate levels were higher in the E-SPN group(P<0.05). Early SPN significantly reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation (157.8 ± 54.6 vs. 183.6 ± 61.0 h, P=0.035) and ICU stay (240 vs. 288 h, P=0.015), without affecting…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free