Evidence Hub

Effects of different doses of exercise in adjunct to diet-induced weight loss on the AGE-RAGE axis in patients with short standing type 2 diabetes: Secondary analysis of the DOSE-EX multi-arm, parallel-group, randomised trial

Grit E. Legaard, M. Lyngbæk, T. Almdal, Cody Durrer, Ulrikke Nystrup, E. L. Larsen, Henrik E. Poulsen, K. Karstoft et al.

Free Radical Biology & Medicine, 2023

80 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

These secondary analyses aimed to investigate the effects of different volumes of exercise in adjunct to diet-induced weight loss and standard care on advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and receptor for AGE (RAGE). We hypothesized that exercise in adjunct to a diet-induced weight loss would dose-dependently increase the soluble decoy receptor for AGE (sRAGE) more than diet-induced weight loss and standard care alone. Secondarily, we expected changes in sRAGE to be associated with improved glycaemic control and inversely associated with low-grade inflammation.

METHODS

The DOSE-EX study was a 16-week parallel-group, 4-arm, single-centre, assessor-blinded, randomised, controlled trial (NCT03769883). We included persons living with T2D, duration ≤7 years, BMI >27 kg/m2 and <40 kg/m2, without severe diabetic complications. Participants were randomised (1:1:1:1) to either 1) standard care as control (CON), 2) standard care + diet (DCON), 3) standard care + diet + moderate exercise dose (MED) or 4) standard care + diet + high exercise dose (HED). Standard care included algorithm-guided pharmacological treatment. The diet intervention aimed at 25% reduced energy intake. The supervised exercise sessions included two aerobic sessions + one combined (aerobic and resistance training) session per week for the MED group, and four aerobic sessions + two combined sessions per week for the HED group. Primary outcome was the change in sRAGE from baseline to 16-week…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 80 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free