Evidence Hub

Associations Between Patterns of Daily Stepping Behavior, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Pain Symptoms Among Older Adults with Chronic Pain: A Secondary Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Trials

Jason Fanning, Amber K. Brooks, M. Irby, K. N'dah, W. Rejeski

Clinical Interventions in Aging, 2024

4 citations

Abstract

Purpose One’s amount, intensity, and distribution of physical activity may have implications for whether it has positive or negative effects on pain and quality of life for older adults living with chronic pain. Thus, we investigated baseline patterns of stepping related to pain symptoms and health-related quality of life at baseline and over a 12-week follow-up period. Patients and Methods Participants were low-active older adults (69.54±6.74 years) with obesity and chronic pain who enrolled in one of two randomized controlled trials. Participants completed measures of pain intensity, interference, and health-related quality of life and wore an accelerometer for 7 days at baseline and week 12. Functional principal components analysis identified patterns of within-day stepping behavior at baseline, and linear regressions were used to investigate how these component scores related to pain and health-related quality of life at baseline and over 12 weeks. Results Two patterns were extracted; one describing more vs less stepping and the second capturing movement later vs earlier in the day. More baseline stepping was associated with better physical functioning (B=0.148, p<0.001) and energy (B=0.073, p=0.033), while a later start in the day was associated with worse social functioning (B=−0.193, p=0.031). More stepping at baseline predicted positive changes in physical functioning (B=0.094, p=0.019), emotional role limitations (B=0.132, p=0.049), energy (B=0.112, p<0.001), social…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free