Evidence Hub

Prevalence of secondary erythrocytosis in men receiving testosterone therapy: A matched-cohort analysis of intranasal gel, injections, and pellets

R. Reddy, P. Diaz, R. Blachman-Braun, J. Loloi, F. Rahman, J. Ory, A. Dullea, I. Zucker et al.

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2023

5 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Increased hematocrit (HCT) is a common adverse effect in men on testosterone therapy (TTh). We aimed to uncover differences in HCT changes among men receiving different forms of TTh, namely intranasal gels, intramuscular injections, and subcutaneous pellets.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, retrospective, matched-cohort study of patients treated for testosterone deficiency (TD) to investigate the effect of three TTh regimens on HCT. We included men who received intranasal testosterone (NT), intramuscular testosterone (TC), or subcutaneous testosterone pellet (TP) regimens between January 2011 and December 2020. We matched treatment cohorts 1:1:1 for age, body mass index (BMI), and history of obstructive sleep apnea. Those taking TTh for less than 16 weeks were excluded. Comparison between groups was performed with U-Mann Whitney test, Student t-test, ANOVA, or Kruskal Wallis test as appropriate.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight matched-cohort individuals with testosterone deficiency (TD) received either NT, TC, or TP. The most common TD symptoms prior to initiation of TTh were erectile dysfunction (38%), low libido (22%), and lack of energy (17%). Baseline serum testosterone and HCT were higher in NT (p<0.05) recipients. As expected, all men receiving TTh were found to have increased serum testosterone levels at followup (p<0.001). Relative to their respective baselines, men receiving TC experienced the greatest increase in serum testosterone (240.8 ng/dL to 585.5…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free