Evidence Hub

Short energy intake is associated with muscle mass loss in older patients with type 2 diabetes: A prospective study of the KAMOGAWA-DM cohort

Rena Kawano, Fuyuko Takahashi, Yoshitaka Hashimoto, Takuro Okamura, Akane Miki, Ayumi Kaji, Ryosuke Sakai, Noriyuki Kitagawa et al.

Clinical Nutrition, 2021

116 participants · 34 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIM

Past studies reported that the intake of adequate energy is more important than protein intake; however, the relationship between energy intake and muscle mass loss remains unclear thus far. This study therefore explored the association between energy intake and muscle mass loss in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, impedance body composition and a brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire were used for analyzing body composition and habitual diet intake, respectively. Skeletal muscle mass index (SMI, kg/m2) was defined as appendicular muscle mass (kg) ÷ height-squared (m2). Rate of SMI change (%) was calculated as ([SMI at baseline - SMI at follow-up]/[follow-up duration (years) × baseline SMI (kg/m2)]) × 100, and muscle mass loss was defined as rate of SMI change ≥0.5%. Energy intake was defined as total energy intake (kcal/day) divided by ideal body weight (kg), defined as 22 × patient height-squared (m2).

RESULTS

Among non-older and older participants, 54.8% (n = 51/93) and 58.9% (n = 116/197) experienced muscle mass loss at 16.3 (6.4) and 18.1 (7.1) months' follow-up, respectively. Logistic regression analyses showed that energy intake was associated with incident muscle mass loss after adjusting for age, sex, insulin, sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist, steroids, smoking, exercise, alcohol intake, body mass index, SMI, presence of renal failure, and protein…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 116 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free