Evidence Hub

Dietary crude glycerol as an energy source in broiler chickens: a meta-analysis

R. O. Sulaimon, Ridwan Olalekan Oyeniyi, Y. Sopian, K. Sahatsanon, A. Jayanegara, P. Sivapirunthep, Pattraphorn Patthararangsarith, C. Chaosap

Animal bioscience, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Objective This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of dietary crude glycerol (CG) supplementation on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, and blood biochemical parameters in broiler chickens. Methods A systematic search of peer-reviewed studies in Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol. Twenty-five eligible studies were included. Effect sizes were calculated as standardized mean differences using a random-effects model in OpenMEE software. Subgroup analyses were performed according to strain, sex, rearing phase, and inclusion level. Results CG supplementation increased body weight gain (p<0.05) and improved feed conversion ratio (p<0.05), while feed intake was unaffected. Among carcass traits, breast yield increased (p<0.05), whereas carcass yield and thigh yield were not affected. CG inclusion also reduced meat ash content and ultimate pH, while drip loss increased, indicating potential negative effects on water-holding capacity. Blood biochemical indices, including reduced alanine aminotransferase and elevated alkaline phosphatase, indicated adaptive physiological responses without evidence of toxicity. Subgroup analyses revealed that strain, sex, and inclusion level moderated growth outcomes (p<0.05). Conclusion CG can be incorporated into broiler diets as an alternative energy source to enhance growth performance without compromising carcass yield.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free