Evidence Hub

Nitrogen and truly digestible protein efficiencies of dairy cows fed fresh herbage- or maize forage-based diets: a meta-analysis

M. Ferreira, Rémy Delagarde, S. Lemosquet, Nadège Edouard

Animal, 2025

153 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Understanding how dietary forage influences dairy cows' use of nitrogen (N) and protein resources may help decrease N losses to the environment, which is a major issue in the livestock sector. The present study evaluated the effects of cow and diet characteristics on N use efficiency and the efficiency of truly digestible protein in the intestine (PDI) (i.e., protein use efficiency at the metabolic level), depending on whether the base forage is fresh herbage or maize forage. To this end, a meta-analysis was performed of a dataset composed of 22 experiments that included 266 observations of individual in vivo whole-tract digestibility and N balance for lactating dairy cows fed either fresh herbage diets indoors (Fresh herbage, n = 113) or maize forage diets (Maize, n = 153). The dataset compiled dietary and zootechnical variables such as feed intake, chemical composition of the diet, milk yield (MY), milk composition and cow characteristics. The nutritional value of diets, cow protein requirements and PDI use efficiency were calculated for all diets according to the INRA 2018 feeding system for ruminants. The dataset was then analysed using mixed-effect models, considering the experiment and the cow as random effects. Feed intake, MY and dietary PDI concentration were greater for Maize diets than Fresh herbage diets, while dietary N and energy concentrations were greater for Fresh herbage diets. Dietary N concentration influenced N use efficiency the most, while the ratio of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 153 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free