Evidence Hub

Association between preoperative metformin exposure and postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a protocol for a prospective observational cohort study in a Chinese tertiary hospital

Shi J, Zheng J, Zhang X, Liang C, Zhang S, Song C, Sun N, Deng Z et al.

BMJ open, 2026

909 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common and distressing complication following surgery, persisting despite advances in prophylactic regimens. Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) has been identified as a biomarker inversely associated with PONV risk and severity. As metformin is known to elevate circulating GDF-15 levels, we hypothesise that preoperative metformin use may be associated with a lower incidence of PONV. This study aims to evaluate the association between a history of preoperative metformin administration and the occurrence of PONV in adults undergoing general anaesthesia.

Methods and analysis: This is a single-centre, prospective, observational cohort study. We plan to enrol 909 adult patients scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation from December 2025 to December 2028. Participants will be divided into two groups based on their preoperative metformin exposure: an exposed group (n=303) with a documented history of metformin use and a non-exposed group (n=606) without such history, using a 1:2 ratio. The metformin regimen (choice of agent and daily dosage) will be determined by the attending physician as part of routine clinical care, independent of this study. The primary outcome is the incidence of PONV, defined as the occurrence of any nausea, retching or vomiting, within 120 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of PONV in the early (0-24 hours) and late (24-120 hours)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 909 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free