Evidence Hub

Animal Models of Rotator Cuff Injury and Repair: A Systematic Review

Wanlu Zhao, Jin-Wei Yang, Yuhao Kang, Kaiyan Hu, Mingyue Jiao, Bing Zhao, Yanbiao Jiang, Chen Liu et al.

Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2022

28 citations

Abstract

There are a large number of animal studies on rotator cuff injury and repair, but a lack of detailed research and evaluation on the animal models. This systematic review aims to provide a framework for animal studies and repair patches for rotator cuff injury. Four hundred nine animal studies were included, of which the most common animal model of rotator cuff injury is rat (53.56%), the most common site of rotator cuff injury is the supraspinatus tendon (62.10%), and the most common injury type (degree) is acute tear (full thickness) (48.41%). The most common research purpose is to evaluate the repair effect of the patch (24.94%), followed by the observation of pathophysiological changes after rotator cuff injury (20.87%). Among the five types of repair patch materials including nondegradable and degradable synthetic materials, autologous and allogeneic tissues, and naturally derived biomaterial, the last one is the mostly used (52.74%). For different animal models, the rodent models (rat and mouse) are the most commonly used and probably the most suitable species for preliminary studies of rotator cuff injury; the rabbit, canine, sheep, and goat models are more suitable for biomechanical performance testing, rehabilitation training, and validation of surgical methods; and the nonhuman primate models (monkey and baboon) are the closest to human, but it is more difficult to carry out the animal studies on them because of ethical issues, high feeding cost, and management…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free