Evidence Hub

Species-specific molecular differentiation of embryonic inner cell mass and trophectoderm: A systematic review

T. V. Marsico, R. Valente, K. Annes, Andressa Minozzo Oliveira, Mara Viana Silva, M. Sudano

Animal Reproduction Science, 2023

3 citations

Abstract

A wide-ranging review study regarding the molecular characterization of the first cell lineages of the developmental embryo is lacking, especially for the primary events during earliest differentiation which leads to the determination of cellular fate. Here, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE-PubMed was searched based on an established search strategy through April 2021. Thirty-six studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria were subjected to qualitative and quantitative analysis. Among the studies, 50 % (18/36) used mice as an animal model, 22.2 % (8/36) pigs, 16.7 % (6/36) cattle, 5.5 % (2/36) humans, and 2.8 % (1/36) goats as well as 2.8 % (1/36) equine. Our results demonstrated that each of the first cell lineages of embryos requires a certain pattern of expression to establish the cellular determination of fate. Moreover, these patterns are shared by many species, particularly for those molecules that have already been identified in the literature as biomarkers. In conclusion, the present study integrated carefully chosen studies regarding embryonic development and first cellular decisions in mammalian species and summarized the information about the differential characterization of the first cell lineages and their possible relationship with specific gene expression.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free