Evidence Hub

Effect of sirolimus on carotid atherosclerosis in kidney transplant recipients: data derived from a prospective randomized controlled trial

A. L. Silva, D. Fusco, H. S. Nga, H. Takase, A. Bravin, M. M. Contti, M. Valiatti, L. D. de Andrade

Clinical Kidney Journal, 2018

23 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background In animal models, the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORIs) may prevent atherogenesis by the regulation of homeostasis of cholesterol and by a reduced inflammatory response. The aim of this study is to compare the carotid intima–media thickness (cIMT) between de novo tacrolimus/mycophenolate and tacrolimus/sirolimus at low doses. The cIMT is considered a surrogate marker of atherosclerosis. Methods We evaluated cIMT at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after kidney transplantation in a database derived from a previously published trial. That trial had prospectively randomly assigned kidney transplant recipients older than 60 years of age to one of two groups: tacrolimus/sirolimus (n = 21) or tacrolimus/mycophenolate (n = 23). The cIMT was evaluated by using ultrasound in the common carotid artery wall on both sides. Results The total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were higher in the sirolimus group at 6 and 12 months. The cIMT decreased over time at 6 and 12 months in the sirolimus group (P = 0.012); this decrease continued to be significant in a model adjusted for age, sex, presence of diabetes, statin use and smoking. Conclusions The use of sirolimus plus tacrolimus de novo in kidney transplantation is associated with a reduction in cIMT after 12 months, a decrease more significant than seen with the combination of mycophenolate plus tacrolimus. This suggests a class effect of mTORI in the prevention of atherosclerosis.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 23 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free