Evidence Hub

Perioperative Immunonutrition Modulates Inflammatory Response after Radical Cystectomy: Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Jill M. Hamilton-Reeves, A. Stanley, M. Bechtel, T. Yankee, Prabhakar Chalise, Lauren K Hand, Eugene K. Lee, W. Smelser et al.

Journal of Urology, 2018

29 participants · 61 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Poor preoperative nutritional status is associated with a higher complication rate after radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. Given the short interval between diagnosis and radical cystectomy, we compared the effect of short‐term specialized immunonutrition to that of a standard oral nutritional supplement on the acute inflammatory response and arginine status in patients treated with radical cystectomy. Materials and Methods: In this prospective, randomized study in 29 men 14 received specialized immunonutrition and 15 received oral nutritional supplement. Each group drank 3 cartons per day for 5 days before and 5 days after radical cystectomy. The Th1‐Th2 balance, plasma interleukin‐6 and plasma amino acids were measured at baseline, intraoperatively and on postoperative days 2, 14 and 30. Body composition was measured by dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry at baseline and on postoperative days 14 and 30. Differences in outcomes were assessed using the generalized linear mixed model. Results: In the specialized immunonutrition group there was a 54.3% average increase in the Th1‐Th2 balance according to the tumor necrosis factor‐&agr;‐to‐interleukin‐13 ratio from baseline to intraoperative day, representing a shift toward a Th1 response. In the oral nutritional supplement group the Th1‐Th2 balance decreased 4.8%. The change in the Th1‐Th2 balance between the specialized immunonutrition and oral nutritional supplement groups significantly differed (p…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 29 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free