Evidence Hub

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of High-Dose Intravenous Valproic Acid in Healthy Subjects: A Dose Escalation Trial To Support Clinical Translational Studies

Patrick E. Georgoff, V. Nikolian, T. Bonham, M. Pai, Celia Tafatia, I. Halaweish, K. To, K. Watcharotone et al.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2018

19 participants · 46 citations

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundValproic acid, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, has beneficial effects in the setting of cancer, neurologic diseases, and traumatic injuries. In animal models of traumatic injury, a single dose of valproic acid has been shown to reduce mortality. The purpose of this trial was to determine the maximum tolerated single dose of intravenous valproic acid in healthy humans.MethodsA double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial design was used to identify dose-limiting toxicities in healthy subjects who received a single dose of intravenous valproic acid. Patients were monitored for adverse events and data were collected for pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety profiling of valproic acid.ResultsFifty-nine healthy subjects (mean 30 ± 12 years) were enrolled. Forty-four subjects received valproic acid in doses from 15 to 150 mg/kg. The most common adverse events were hypoacusis (n = 19), chills (n = 18), and headache (n = 16). The maximum tolerated dose was 140 mg/kg. Dose-limiting toxicities included headache and nausea lasting longer than 12 h. No drug-related abnormalities were seen in other safety measures including laboratory tests, hemodynamic parameters, cardiac rhythm monitoring, and cognitive testing. A two-compartment model was predictive of valproic acid concentration–time profiles, with a strong correlation (R2 = 0.56) observed between the number of reported adverse events and the dose level.ConclusionsThe maximum tolerated dose of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free