Evidence Hub

Metformin for the treatment of unruptured vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysm (METTLE): study protocol for a double-blinded randomised controlled trial

Dong L, Xu Z, Li Y, Wei D, Lin J, Wang C, Chen H, Lv M

Trials, 2025

30 participants

Abstract

Background: Vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysm (VBDA) has high morbidity and mortality rates, and it is an important cause of stroke in young and middle-aged adults. Previous studies have shown that aneurysm wall inflammation is a major factor contributing to the high risk of aneurysm growth and rupture. Metformin inhibits inflammation and may be a suitable candidate drug for VBDA. Here, we report the protocol for a study designed to evaluate the ability of metformin to reduce the degree of aneurysm wall inflammation in patients with VBDA, as measured by high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI).

Methods: The study is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, and blinded clinical trial. Sixty patients with unruptured VBDA who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be recruited competitively from three hospitals in China. Patient recruitment began in May 2024 and is expected to end in December 2025. The patients will be randomised (1:1) to treatment or placebo (n = 30 in each group), receiving either 250-mg metformin or placebo orally twice per day for 6 months. The primary outcome will be the change in VBDA wall inflammation measured by HR-VWI. The secondary outcomes will be changes in VBDA morphology, typical imaging signs, and inflammatory biomarkers.

Discussion: Previous studies on metformin for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms have been performed in animals. However, prospective clinical studies in humans are lacking. Therefore, this study will…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free