Evidence Hub

Study protocol of a multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, open-label study investigating the efficacy of a fixed-dose combination regimen of dapagliflozin/metformin versus co-administered dual therapy based on glycemic control, satisfaction and adherence in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus

Wang J, Wei Y, Shi P, Chen J, Xu L, Kong Y, Ye J, Wang X et al.

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025

632 participants

Abstract

Introduction: The combination of dapagliflozin and metformin is commonly used as an initial therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with high glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Although bioequivalence has been established for the fixed-dose combination (FDC) of dapagliflozin/metformin extended-release (XR) compared to the co-administration of dapagliflozin and metformin XR, it remains uncertain whether the efficacy of dapagliflozin/metformin FDC is comparable to that of co-administration. Additionally, it is still unclear whether fixed-dose combinations offer advantages in terms of patient adherence and satisfaction. This study aims to compare the dapagliflozin/metformin XR FDC with co-administration of dapagliflozin and metformin XR for efficacy in terms of glycemic control, patient satisfaction, quality of life and adherence in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed T2DM.

Methods and analysis: This multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, open-label clinical trial enrolled 632 patients with T2DM (HbA1c 7.5-10%) in 35 research centers in China. After enrollment, the patients will be randomly assigned to receive either FDC treatment (10 mg dapagliflozin and 1000 mg metformin XR) or co-administered 10 mg dapagliflozin and 1000 mg metformin XR tablets for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c level from baseline after 24 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c below 7.0%, absolute changes…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 632 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free