Evidence Hub

Cagrilintide-semaglutide (CagriSema) as an add-on to basal insulin in adults with type 2 diabetes (REIMAGINE 3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study

Rosenstock J, Billings LK, Gajria R, Giorgino F, Johansen NB, Klein KR, Thamattoor UK, Buse JB et al.

Lancet (London, England), 2026

340 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Background: Basal insulin treatment for type 2 diabetes often results in inadequate glycaemic control and is associated with weight gain and increased risk of hypoglycaemia. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a once per week combination of cagrilintide with semaglutide (CagriSema) versus placebo as an add-on to basal insulin in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: This double-blind, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, phase 3a study (REIMAGINE 3) was done at 46 centres (university hospitals, health-care centres, research centres, and other clinical trial sites) in six countries (the USA, China, Japan, Serbia, Slovakia, and South Africa). Adults with type 2 diabetes (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 7·0-10·5%) receiving stable once per day basal insulin with or without metformin were randomly assigned (2:2:1:1) to once per week subcutaneous cagrilintide 2·4 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg (hereafter cagrilintide-semaglutide [2·4 mg each]) or cagrilintide 1·0 mg plus semaglutide 1·0 mg (hereafter cagrilintide-semaglutide [1·0 mg each]) or dose-matched placebo (2·4 mg plus 2·4 mg or 1·0 mg plus 1·0 mg) for 40 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by HbA1c of less than 8·5% at screening (yes or no) and country (Japan; yes or no). Participants, care providers, investigators, and outcome assessors were masked within each dose level to treatment allocation, with active treatments visually identical to placebo. The primary endpoint was mean HbA1c change (percentage…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 340 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free