Evidence Hub

A Practical, Noninvasive Urine Collection Method for Mice for Large Cohort Preclinical Studies

N. Sarigul, Avery Antes, J. Lukens, Erik Pearson, Daniela Olivera Velarde, Bulent Aydogan

Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 2026

Abstract

Accurate urine collection is essential for preclinical studies involving metabolism, toxicology, and disease modeling. However, conventional methods such as metabolic caging and manual restraint are often invasive, labor intensive, prone to contamination, and not scalable for large cohorts, while also raising animal welfare concerns. This study presents a noninvasive and practical technique for collecting spot urine samples from healthy and tumor-bearing mice developed as a refinement to existing collection approaches. The method involves positioning the mouse in a natural voiding posture by allowing the hindlimbs to hang freely while the forelimbs grip a wire bar feeder, thereby stabilizing the animal and reducing excessive movement. Gentle abdominal pressure is applied only when needed. The method was validated in 80 C3H/HeJ and athymic nude mice, including both healthy and tumor-bearing (fibrosarcoma or prostate cancer [PC3]) models. Using this approach, spot urine volumes ranging from 13 to 200 µL were reliably collected from all mice, with each successful collection completed within 1 minute. Urine was successfully collected on the first attempt in ∼70% of cases. The mean urine yield was 51.7 ± 38.9 µL for healthy females, 53.7 ± 28.5 µL for healthy males, 50.8 ± 20.2 µL for tumor-bearing females, and 52.2 ± 28.1 µL for tumor-bearing males, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in urine volume distributions between groups. No visible fecal or…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free