Evidence Hub

Dietary patterns and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a Greek case-control study

I. Kalafati, D. Borsa, M. Dimitriou, K. Revenas, A. Kokkinos, G. Dedoussis

Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2019

351 participants · 51 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that posteriori-derived dietary patterns of a Greek sample are associated with the odds for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and common NAFLD-related biomarkers.

METHODS

We recruited 351 individuals (134 NAFLD patients, 217 controls). NAFLD was diagnosed with abdominal ultrasound. Dietary intake data were collected through a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire of 172 items and dietary patterns were derived by factor analysis. Consumption of dietary patterns was divided into quartiles. Multivariate logistic and linear regression models were applied to investigate associations of dietary patterns with NAFLD odds and common NAFLD-associated biomarkers.

RESULTS

Four dietary patterns were identified. Adherence to the fast food-type dietary pattern was independently associated with higher odds for NAFLD. However, results were statistically significant only for the highest versus the lowest consumption (odds ratio, 3.9; P = 0.003). On the contrary, individuals in the second quartile of the unsaturated fatty acid dietary pattern had 55.7% reduced odds of developing NAFLD than those in the first quartile after adjusting for age, sex, energy intake, physical activity level, pack-years smoked, education years, and presence of metabolic syndrome (P = 0.039). The fast food-type pattern was further associated with higher levels of C-reactive protein and uric acid and the unsaturated fatty acid pattern with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 351 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free