Evidence Hub

Challenges in causality assessment of renal dysfunction during sequential treatment for presumed rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in an elderly patient

Hoang TTT, Ha HC, Nguyen HT, Nguyen TH, Codlin AJ, Vo LNQ

IDCases, 2026

Abstract

Background: Renal impairment during treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) is uncommon but clinically significant, especially in elderly patients with limited physiological reserve. Determining whether renal dysfunction is attributable to anti-tuberculosis drugs or patient-related factors remains a major clinical challenge, particularly following sequential regimen changes.

Case presentation: A 74-year-old man with a low body mass index (17.5 kg/m²) was treated for presumed RR-TB based on a single Xpert MTB/RIF assay showing rifampicin resistance despite persistently negative smear microscopy and mycobacterial culture. Baseline renal function was normal (serum creatinine 89 µmol/L; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 73.2 mL/min/1.73 m²). Eighteen days after initiation of a long oral regimen (D2: levofloxacin, clofazimine, linezolid, pyrazinamide, and cycloserine), acute kidney injury developed, with serum creatinine increasing to 140 µmol/L and eGFR declining to 42.34 mL/min/1.73 m². The regimen was switched to BPaLM, during which renal function worsened with marked fluctuations (eGFR 24.65-57.3 mL/min/1.73 m²), requiring supportive care. Renal function partially improved after treatment interruption. Rechallenge with the D2 regimen was associated with relatively less fluctuation in renal function. WHO-UMC causality assessment classified the relationship between anti-tuberculosis treatment and renal dysfunction as "possible."

Conclusion: This case…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free