Evidence Hub

Time-Restricted Eating and Metformin in Invasive Breast Cancer or DCIS: A Randomized, Phase IIb, Presurgical Trial. Preliminary Safety Analysis

Briata IM, Spinaci S, Thomas PS, Serrano D, Buttiron Webber T, Gandolfo N, Guasone F, Rattaro A et al.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2026

14 participants

Abstract

Cancer cells exhibit metabolic flexibility between anaerobic glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation. Preclinical data showed that metformin, an oxidative phosphorylation inhibitor, combined with fasting-induced hypoglycemia led to activation of the PP2A-GSK3ß-Mcl1 axis and inhibition of tumor growth. A window-of-opportunity trial was designed to evaluate the effect of metformin and nightly fasting on proliferation in invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The primary endpoint is the pretreatment/posttreatment change of Ki67 in cancer tissue, and the co-primary endpoint is the difference in posttreatment Ki67 in cancer-adjacent DCIS or high-risk lesions. Participants with hormone receptor-positive invasive breast cancer or DCIS candidates to surgery are being accrued and randomized to either (i) fasting for ≥16 hours nightly, plus nutritional counseling and daily metformin with continuous glucose monitoring, or (ii) continuous glucose monitoring. The intervention lasts 4 to 6 weeks with gradual metformin ramp up to limit gastrointestinal disturbances. The safety of the combination was evaluated as a primary interim endpoint. The frequency of dose-limiting toxicity (≥G3 adverse events related to treatment) was assessed in the first 14 participants in the experimental arm. Most adverse events were of low grade (G1: 50; 90.9%) and unrelated to the treatment (G1: 26 unrelated; 52%). No one discontinued treatment because of toxicity, and no dose-limiting…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 14 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free