Evidence Hub

MetAAA Trial Patients Receiving Metformin Therapy Show Limited Improvement in Quality of Life Compared to AAA Patients with Placebo Intake-A Double-Blind, Randomized, and Placebo-Controlled Trial

Klopf J, Willixhofer R, Ahmadi-Fazel D, Scheuba A, Fuchs L, Sotir A, Wanhainen A, Brostjan C et al.

Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025

54 participants

Abstract

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a multifactorial vascular disease with limited therapeutic options, as no pharmacological treatments currently exist to mitigate the progression of small AAAs. Quality of life (QoL) has emerged as a valuable supplementary metric for assessing the efficacy of pharmacological interventions. This study evaluated QoL scores of MetAAA trial patients on metformin therapy compared to those with placebo intake. Methods: Overall, 54 patients with AAA were included in the MetAAA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov-Identifier:NCT03507413) and randomized to either metformin or placebo treatment. All participants were asked to complete three established and validated (in total 659 longitudinally collected) QoL questionnaires: (1) the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), (2) the Aneurysm Symptom Rating Questionnaire (ASRQ), and (3) the Aneurysm-Dependent Quality of Life questionnaire (ADQoL). Results: A superior health-related QoL was found in metformin-treated AAA patients compared to enrolled AAA patients receiving a placebo. In detail, AAA patients undergoing metformin treatment showed a superior overall current QoL score (p = 0.038), general health perception (p = 0.013), improved physical functioning (p = 0.004), and increased energy/lower fatigue scores (p = 0.008). Furthermore, fewer limitations due to cognitive distress (p = 0.001) and lower limb function (p = 0.021) were detected. Other QoL subscales did not show statistical significance.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 54 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free