Evidence Hub

Chronotype Differences in Energy Intake, Cardiometabolic Risk Parameters, Cancer and Depression: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

S. Lotti, G. Pagliai, B. Colombini, F. Sofi, M. Dinu

Advances in Nutrition, 2021

377,797 participants · 93 citations

Abstract

Chronotype is a behavioral manifestation of the internal circadian clock system. It refers to the specific activity-rest preference of an individual over a 24-hour period and can be assessed using different methodologies that classify individuals into morning or evening chronotype. In recent years, several studies have suggested a relationship between individual chronotype, eating habits, and the risk of developing obesity and other conditions. Our aim was to evaluate the association between chronotype, energy intake and health status through a meta-analytical approach. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Database was conducted. Observational studies that reported a measure of association between chronotype, energy intake and health indicators were considered eligible. Overall, 39 observational studies (37 cross-sectional studies, 2 prospective cohort studies) were included in the systematic review, with a total of 377,797 subjects. By comparing morning and evening subjects, pooled analyses of cross-sectional studies showed significantly (P < 0.001) higher levels of blood glucose [Mean Difference (MD) 7.82; 95% CI 3.18, 12.45], glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) [MD 7.64; 95% CI 3.08, 12.21], LDL-cholesterol [MD 13.69; 95% CI 6.84, 20.54] and triglycerides [MD 12.62; 95% CI 0.90, 24.35] in evening subjects. Furthermore, an association between evening type and the risk of diabetes [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.30; 95% CI 1.20, 1.41], cancer [OR 1.18;…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 377,797 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free