Evidence Hub

Melanoidins from coffee and bread differently influence energy intake: A randomized controlled trial of food intake and gut-brain axis response

J. M. Walker, I. Mennella, R. Ferracane, S. Tagliamonte, Ann-Katrin Holik, Kathrin Hölz, M. Somoza, V. Somoza et al.

2020

14 participants · 26 citations

Abstract

Abstract Melanoidins are Maillard reaction products similar to dietary fiber but their effect on food intake was under-investigated. A randomized, crossover study of 14 healthy subjects investigated whether melanoidins modulated energy intake and affected the postprandial dynamics of 21 gut-brain modulators of appetite including gastrointestinal peptides, endocannabinoids, N-acylethanolamines and neuropeptides. At breakfast the subjects consumed a bread enriched with either 3 g coffee melanoidins (CM), 3 g bread melanoidins (BM), or a conventional bread (CT). Energy intakes at lunch and throughout the day were measured, while appetite sensations and blood samples were collected before and 30, 60, 120, and 180 min after breakfast. Compared to CT, CM significantly reduced daily energy intake by 26%. CM lowered blood glucose peak, insulin, α-melanocyte stimulating hormone, orexin-A, β-endorphin, and blunted the response of three N-acylethanolamines versus BM. Coffee melanoidins at breakfast reduces daily energy intake and modulates postprandial glycemia and other biomarkers.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 14 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free