Evidence Hub

Exercise, diet, and cognition in a 4-year randomized controlled trial: Dose-Responses to Exercise Training (DR's EXTRA)

P. Komulainen, J. Tuomilehto, K. Savonen, R. Männikkö, M. Hassinen, T. Lakka, T. Hänninen, V. Kiviniemi et al.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2021

1,401 participants · 46 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Evidence for the effects of exercise and dietary interventions on cognition from long-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in large general populations remains insufficient. Objective The objective of our study was to investigate the independent and combined effects of resistance and aerobic exercise and dietary interventions on cognition in a population sample of middle-aged and older individuals. Methods We conducted a 4-y RCT in 1401 men and women aged 57–78 y at baseline. The participants were randomly assigned to the resistance exercise, aerobic exercise, diet, combined resistance exercise and diet, combined aerobic exercise and diet, or control group. Exercise goals were at least moderate-intensity resistance exercise ≥2 times/wk and at least moderate-intensity aerobic exercise ≥5 times/wk. Dietary goals were ≥400 g/d of vegetables, fruit, and berries; ≥2 servings of fish/wk; ≥14 g fiber/1000 kcal; and ≤10% of energy of daily energy intake from SFAs. The primary outcome was the change in global cognition measured by the total score of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) neuropsychological tests [CERAD total score (CERAD-TS)]. The data were analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle and linear mixed-effects models. Results There was a trend toward improved CERAD-TS over 4 y in the combined aerobic exercise and diet group compared with the control group (net increase: 1.4 points; 95% CI: 0.1, 2.7; P = 0.06)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,401 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free