Evidence Hub

CO2 Surgical Laser for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

J. Alexander, P. Karjalainen, L. Ow, M. Kulkarni, J. Lee, T. Karjalainen, A. Leitch, Germana Ryan et al.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022

52 participants · 25 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stress Urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common condition that can be treated conservatively and/or surgically. Given the risks of surgery, there would be benefits for patients to develop effective non-surgical treatment options. Some studies have suggested laser therapy may improve or cure SUI however there is a lack of sham-controlled randomised controlled trials (RCT) to judge treatment efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of CO2 vaginal laser versus sham for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

STUDY DESIGN

This was a multi-centre, participant-blinded, sham-controlled parallel group (1:1) superiority RCT. It was performed in outpatient clinics in 2 hospitals. We included women aged 18-80 with objective and subjective SUI. Participants had undertaken or declined supervised pelvic floor muscle training. Intervention was performed using a CO2 fractionated vaginal laser. Participants underwent 3 treatments, 4 weeks apart, with increasing energy and density settings. Sham was performed using an identical technique with a deactivated pedal. The primary outcome was the subjective SUI rate (proportion with leak with cough, sneeze, or laughter) at 3 months after completion of treatment. Secondary outcomes included objective SUI, change in the disease specific patient reported outcomes (PRO), and generic quality of life (HRQOL) as well as adverse effects. Categorical outcomes were compared using the chi-squared test and continuous outcomes using…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 52 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free