Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy on temporomandibular disorders. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials

Leonardo Díaz, Lukas Restelli, Emilia Valencia, Damla Ilhan Atalay, José Manuel Abarca, Alain Chalple Gil, Eduardo Fernández

Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, 2025

1,816 participants · 23 citations

Abstract

• Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) effectively reduces pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD), demonstrating a 60–70 % decrease in VAS pain scores. • Significant improvement in vertical aperture (VA) was observed, with an average increase of 10–20 %, especially with wavelengths between 810 and 940 nm. • LLLT showed superior outcomes compared to conventional treatments like occlusal splints, NSAIDs, and TENS therapy, particularly for myogenic TMD. • Treatment protocols involving more than four weeks provided longer-lasting pain relief and functional improvements. • LLLT demonstrated a high safety profile with minimal adverse effects, supporting its use as a non-invasive therapeutic option. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of LLLT in the management of TMD, focusing on its impact on pain reduction and functional improvement. Additionally, this review sought to identify the most effective laser parameters (wavelength, energy density, and duration of therapy) and compare LLLT outcomes with conventional treatment modalities. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases until December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated LLLT's effects on pain (via Visual Analog Scale) and vertical aperture (VA) were included. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's RoB 2 tool. This systematic review analyzed 44 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with 1,816 participants, confirming…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,816 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free