Evidence Hub

From Conventional Septoplasty to Patient-Specific Cartilage Reshaping: A Systematic Review of Laser-Mediated and Electromechanical Approaches

Alessia Pennacchi, Elisa Raggini, Roberto Spasiano, Filippo Barucca, Matteo Trimarchi

Journal of Personalized Medicine, 2026

9 participants

Abstract

Background: Energy-based techniques for septal cartilage reshaping, including laser-mediated cartilage reshaping (LCR) and electromechanical reshaping (EMR), have been investigated for more than three decades as minimally invasive alternatives to conventional septoplasty. Despite encouraging preclinical findings, their clinical translation remains limited. Their relevance to personalized medicine lies in the possibility of tailoring septal correction to individual anatomy, cartilage-dominant deformity patterns, and patient-specific functional needs. Objective: To systematically review the experimental and clinical evidence on LCR and EMR for nasal septal cartilage reshaping and to evaluate their potential role within a personalized, function-oriented treatment framework. Methods: A PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed for English-language studies published up to June 2025. Original experimental or clinical studies investigating LCR or EMR applied to human or animal septal cartilage were included. Because of heterogeneity in models, dosimetry, and outcome reporting, a qualitative synthesis was undertaken. A design-specific critical appraisal was also performed. Results: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria (LCR: n = 9; EMR: n = 9). LCR consistently induced shape change within a narrow thermo-mechanical relaxation range (55–75 °C), but showed dose-dependent risks of chondrocyte injury and matrix degeneration, with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 9 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free