Evidence Hub

Structural‐Based Design of GLP Inhibitors as Anticancer Agents: A Comprehensive in Silico Study Integrating 3D‐QSAR, Molecular Docking, MD Simulations, and Quantum Mechanical Calculations

Haniyeh Baluch, Ali Ebrahimi

ChemistrySelect, 2026

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this study, a three‐dimensional quantitative structure–activity relationship (3D‐QSAR) analysis was performed on 38 quinazoline derivatives as GLP inhibitors. The Comparative Molecular Similarity Indices Analysis (CoMSIA) model showed strong internal consistency (Q 2 = 0.515, r 2 = 1.000) and good external predictability (K = 0.959, K′ = 1.038, t/t′ = –0.338, R 2 m = 0.98). A virtual screening of a 51,369‐compound quinazoline library was conducted using the CoMSIA model and molecular docking to identify potential GLP inhibitors. The newly predicted compounds exhibited enhanced activity compared to the known actives BIX, E72, and UNC0224. Their ADMET properties were also evaluated, and the top three compounds (Q1, Q2, and Q3), which demonstrated superior pharmacokinetic profiles, were selected as promising GLP inhibitor candidates. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were used to assess the binding stability of the three compounds in the active site of 3RJW (i.e., 3RJW_Q1, 3RJW_Q2, and 3RJW_Q3). The results showed good stability, with a low root‐mean‐square deviation (RMSD) of lower than 0.7 nm. The relative binding free energy (ΔG bind ) values obtained from MM‐GBSA and MM‐PBSA analyses for mentioned complexes are in consistent with the total scores obtained from docking analysis, and support the reliability of the results. Per‐residue energy decomposition analysis highlighted four key amino acids—PHE1087, PHE1158, ASP1090, and PRO1121—as critical contributors to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free