Evidence Hub

Pharmacist-driven optimization of presumptive psittacosis management: a case report of rapid clinical resolution

Ji G, Duan J

Journal of infection in developing countries, 2026

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chlamydia psittaci has a high incidence of pneumonia after infection, but clinical diagnosis still faces challenges due to the lack of specific clinical manifestations and low positive rates in routine testing.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 60-year-old female patient with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) failed to respond to initial intravenous antimicrobial therapy with cefmetazole/ciprofloxacin followed by piperacillin-tazobactam/levofloxacin, exhibiting persistent fever and worsening symptoms. Serial laboratory testing revealed progressive elevation of inflammatory markers, with C-reactive protein (CRP) rising from 110.2 to 120.9 mg/L and procalcitonin (PCT) from 1.37 to 2.15 ng/mL. Essential bronchoscopic examination and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) could not be performed due to patient refusal, creating a diagnostic deadlock. The clinical pharmacist identified avian exposure during medication rounds, enabling presumptive diagnosis of psittacosis. Immediate pharmacist-initiated interventions included discontinuation of levofloxacin and commencement of targeted oral minocycline therapy. Clinical resolution occurred within 48 hours with defervescence and symptomatic improvement. Subsequent minocycline-induced nausea and diarrhea were effectively managed through pharmacist-instructed co-administration with food. Continuous clinical improvement facilitated discharge on oral minocycline, with follow-up imaging confirming complete resolution of pulmonary…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free