Evidence Hub

Impact of Diabetes on the Outcomes of Patients With Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Docetaxel: A Pooled Analysis of Three Phase III Studies

Abdel-Rahman O

Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2019

1,600 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current study aims to provide an assessment of the impact of diabetes mellitus and its metformin treatment on the outcomes of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) within a pooled dataset of 3 clinical trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a pooled analysis of the comparator arms of 3 clinical trials (NCT00988208; NCT00273338; NCT00519285) that evaluated docetaxel/prednisone in chemotherapy-naive patients with CRPC. Overall survival according to patient subsets (nondiabetic patients, diabetic metformin patients, and diabetic non-metformin patients) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting overall survival was then performed through Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS: A total of 1600 patients were enrolled into the current study, of which 147 patients were diabetic patients receiving metformin, 116 patients were diabetic patients not receiving metformin, and 1337 were nondiabetic patients. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, no evidence for overall survival difference was found among the 3 patient subsets (diabetic metformin patients, diabetic non-metformin patients, and nondiabetic patients) (P = .908). The following factors were predictive of worse overall survival in multivariate analysis: lower hemoglobin (P < .0001), lower body mass index (P = .041), shorter docetaxel treatment (P < .0001), and higher M1 sub-stage (P = .016).

CONCLUSION: Diabetes mellitus (with or without metformin treatment)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,600 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free