Evidence Hub

Risk factors for bone fractures in type 2 diabetes and the impact of once-weekly exenatide: insights from an EXSCEL post-hoc analysis

Maddaloni E, Coleman RL, Holman RR

Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2025

14,752 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

AIMS: We investigated bone fracture predictors in people with T2D enrolled in the EXenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) and evaluated the effects of once-weekly exenatide (EQW) on incident bone fractures.

METHODS: EXSCEL randomised 14,752 people to EQW 2 mg or placebo with a median follow-up of 3.2 years. In this post-hoc analysis, baseline features associated with incident bone fractures were evaluated with multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models, accounting for age and sex as confounders. Incidence rates were compared between study arms, and time-to-event analyses performed using Cox-proportional hazard models.

RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 168 (1.1 %) participants. The presence of neuropathy at baseline was associated with a 50 % higher risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.50, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.10-2.05, P = 0.010) of incident bone fractures, while taking metformin at baseline was associated with a 47 % lower risk (HR 0.53, 95 %CI 0.39-0.73, P < 0.001). Incidence rates of bone fractures were similar in the EQW group and in the placebo group (HR 1.11, 95 %CI 0.82-1.51, P = 0.49).

CONCLUSIONS: Bone fractures in people with T2D occur more frequently in those with diabetic neuropathy, but less frequently in those taking metformin. No evidence was seen of any impact of EQW treatment on bone fractures.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 14,752 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free