Evidence Hub

Association of Hyperautofluorescence Signals with Geographic Atrophy Progression in the METformin for the MINimization of Geographic Atrophy Progression Trial

Taha AT, Shen LL, Diaz A, Chahal N, Saroya J, Sun M, Allingham MJ, Farsiu S et al.

Ophthalmology science, 2025

44 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between rim area focal hyperautofluorescence (RAFH) signals and geographic atrophy (GA) growth rates, as well as the impact of oral metformin on the longitudinal change of RAFH.

DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-one eyes from 44 participants with GA and ≥6 months of follow-up in the METformin for the MINimization of geographic atrophy progression study.

METHODS: Fundus autofluorescence images were captured using a 488 nm excitation wavelength. Two masked graders identified and measured RAFH lesions using proprietary semiautomatic segmentation software and ImageJ. We calculated RAFH by dividing the areas of hyperautofluorescence within a 450-μm rim circumscribing the GA by the total area enclosed within this rim.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Longitudinal changes in RAFH and GA area.

RESULTS: Baseline RAFH was positively associated with the baseline square root of GA area 0.065/year (P < 0.001). In the entire study cohort, higher baseline RAFH was associated with a faster GA area growth rate in mm2/year (Spearman's ρ = 0.53; P < 0.001). The association became weaker in square root-transformed GA area growth (ρ = 0.19, P = 0.11) and perimeter-adjusted GA growth rate (ρ = 0.28, P = 0.02), achieving statistical significance only in the latter. When this analysis was stratified into 3 baseline GA tertiles, the first and second tertiles showed weak to moderate association with statistical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 44 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free