Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review of Post-Quantum Cryptography for Healthcare Data Protection: Performance, Readiness, and Deployment Challenges

Taboka Ngwenya, B. Ndlovu

JOURNAL OF APPLIED INFORMATICS AND COMPUTING, 2026

4 citations

Abstract

The traditional cryptographic methods used to protect healthcare data, especially for the long-term storage of medical imaging records, are becoming increasingly threatened by the quick development of quantum computing. The purpose of this study is to assess the challenges, efficacy, and preparedness of integrating Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) into healthcare information systems. Twenty peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025 were analysed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. The review was conducted using a systematic research design that included qualitative thematic synthesis, predetermined eligibility criteria, and database searching. According to the results, lattice-based PQC schemes, specifically, CRYSTALS-Kyber for encryption and CRYSTALS-Dilithium for authentication, show great promise because of their effectiveness, resilience, and suitability for decentralized architectures like blockchain and Internet-of-Medical-Things environments. Nonetheless, the review points out a notable deficiency of empirical assessment in actual healthcare settings, particularly with regard to cloud-based platforms and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems utilized in medical imaging processes. Scalability limitations, intricate key-management specifications, system interoperability restrictions, and the requirement for conformity with regulatory and compliance frameworks are some of the major issues…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free