Evidence Hub

Safety and Efficacy of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Use in Elderly People With Obesity-A Meta-Analysis

Rego de Figueiredo I, Simas FS, Ghiletchi A, Oliveira Torres J, Silva-Nunes J

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2026

1,229 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) for the treatment of older adults with obesity compared to younger individuals.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO CRD420251074381). PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched until May 17, 2025, for randomized controlled trials and observational studies assessing GLP-1 RA in adults ≥ 65 years with obesity with or without type 2 diabetes. Random effects meta-analyses calculated the log odds ratios (LOR) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with equivalence testing via two one-sided tests (TOST) and meta-regression for baseline adjustments.

Results: Five studies involving 1229 participants were included. No significant difference in serious adverse events was found between older and younger adults (pooled LOR: 0.06, p = 0.9). Older adults had a trend toward lower frequency of nausea (LOR: -0.44, p = 0.06) but higher incidence of constipation (LOR: 0.72, p = 0.02) and hypoglycemia (LOR: 0.97, p < 0.001). Efficacy in metabolic and weight control was comparable. Additionally, one study suggested that liraglutide could reduce fat mass without worsening sarcopenia.

Conclusions: GLP-1 RA therapy seems to be safe and effective in older adults with obesity, achieving similar effects on weight loss and glycemic control as in younger individuals.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,229 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free