Evidence Hub

Predictors of Initial and Sustained Glycemic and Weight Response to Tirzepatide: A Post Hoc Analysis of SURPASS-4

Pearson ER, Del Prato S, Pavo I, Franco DR, Zheng J, Nicolay C, Hemmingway A, Wiese RJ et al.

Diabetes, 2025

6 citations

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This post hoc analysis assessed sustainability of lowered glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and weight with tirzepatide in people with type 2 diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk. Participants achieving HbA1c ≤48 mmol/mol (6.5%) or weight loss ≥10% at 52 weeks were evaluated for sustained glycemic or weight control and predictors of initial and sustained efficacy. For tirzepatide-treated participants achieving HbA1c ≤48 mmol/mol (6.5%) at 52 weeks, 75-84% sustained this until study end (median 81 weeks). Factors predicting achievement were higher tirzepatide dose, shorter diabetes duration, and lower HbA1c, higher HOMA of β-cell function (HOMA-B), metformin alone, and absence of albuminuria at baseline. Factors predicting sustained glycemic control were greater weight loss, smaller fasting glucose decrease, no sulfonylurea, and higher HOMA-B at 52 weeks. For participants achieving ≥10% weight loss at 52 weeks, 79-82% maintained weight loss. Factors predicting achievement were higher tirzepatide dose, female sex, no cardiovascular disease history, and lower baseline HbA1c, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and triglycerides. Greater decrease in LDL-cholesterol to 52 weeks predicted maintained weight loss. Greater weight loss and better β-cell function achieved with tirzepatide were the main predictors for sustained glycemic control in this post hoc analysis; no clinically meaningful predictor was identified for sustained weight control.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS: We…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free