Evidence Hub

Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Metformin on the Progression of Different Types of Prediabetes Mellitus

Qian X, Wang B, Yang X, Qian B, Zhang Q, Guo J, Jia G, Lin T

Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2026

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the differential effects of metformin on progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among individuals with different prediabetes subtypes, including impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and combined IFG+IGT. Following PRISMA guidelines, ten databases, including PubMed and Cochrane, were systematically searched from inception to May 2025. Eighteen randomized controlled trials were included, and relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models as appropriate. Subgroup analyses were conducted by prediabetes subtype and intervention duration. Metformin reduced the risk of progression to T2DM by 35% compared with lifestyle intervention or placebo (RR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.55-0.77; P < 0.00001), with moderate heterogeneity. The preventive effect was strongest among individuals with IFG (RR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.24-0.61; P < 0.0001), followed by those with IGT (RR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.43-0.79; P < 0.0004) and combined IFG+IGT (RR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.70-0.86; P < 0.00001). An intervention duration of ≤24 months was associated with a greater effect in the IGT subtype (RR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.16-0.44; P < 0.00001). Metformin also increased the proportion of individuals achieving normoglycemia (RR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.39-2.34; P < 0.0001). This study was limited by reliance on published aggregate data without individual patient-level information to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free